Leaderboard › onlyseeker.io
onlyseeker.io
- Fresh results · 14 days
- 96%
- Dead profiles
- 1%
- Filters working
- 0/5
- Median search speed
- 550 ms
onlyseeker.io never tells you which results are ads
360 of 360 paid placements we found carried no "Ad" or "Sponsored" label. They look exactly like real search results.
- Up to 100% of the first 50 results on the Home search are paid placements.
- Paying for placement is fine. Hiding it isn't: you can't tell which creators matched your search and which paid to be there.
Score over time
What we found
- Freshest organic results of the 25 (91-93% active on location pages).
- Filter panel does nothing: tags are written to the URL but never sent to the server.
- Asian and red-hair category pages show 2 and 9 organic creators; the rest are ads.
- Sponsored cards are not labelled.
- Shows a fake 'people viewing' counter that changes on every page load.
Score breakdown
| Component | Weight | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh results | 20 | 96/100 |
| Live profiles | 10 | 99/100 |
| Ads labelled | 15 | 0/100 |
| Ad density | 10 | 54/100 |
| Filters that work | 15 | 0/100 |
| Page coverage | 10 | 40/100 |
| UK access | 10 | 100/100 |
| Search speed | 5 | 93/100 |
| Location accuracy | 15 | 5/100 |
| Page speed | 10 | 72/100 |
| Features | 15 | 42/100 |
| Tag accuracy | — | not yet measured |
Ads
0% of 360 paid placements were visibly labelled as ads.
Filters
0/5 criteria of the combined search (Sydney + blonde + young + female + cosplay) worked. Applied: tags female, young, blonde, cosplay offered. Panel never sends tags to the server.
Search speed
Median time from search to results: 550 ms (server response 320 ms; our UK test connection alone 620 ms).
Network
Shares the OnlyFinder ad network (pur.agency) with:
- onlyfinder.com#11 · 67.4
- fanslist.com#4 · 74.3
- fanscentral.com#8 · 70.5
- onlysearch.co#15 · 61.9
Paid cards route through the same a.pur.agency / onlysearch.click broker payload format.
Search-by-search results
| Search | Listed | Paid | Paid labelled | Organic checked | Live | Active (14 d) | Dead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 40 | 40 | 0/40 | 0 | — | — | — |
| England | 260 | 79 | 0/79 | 181 | 98% | 91% | 2% |
| London | 240 | 38 | 0/38 | 200 | 98% | 91% | 3% |
| Sedona, Arizona (pop. ~10k) | 120 | 8 | 0/8 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Asian | 83 | 81 | 0/81 | 2 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| Red hair | 80 | 71 | 0/71 | 9 | 100% | 100% | 0% |
| Combined filter search | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — | — |
| Combined text search | 247 | 43 | 0/43 | 200 | 98% | 92% | 3% |
Are the results really from there?
| Search | In the right place | In the UK / Arizona | Location not disclosed | Judged |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | 4% | 4% | 129 | 52 |
| London | 6% | 6% | 146 | 54 |
| Sedona, Arizona (pop. ~10k) | 0% (nearby 0%) | 0% AZ | 74 | 38 |
| Combined filter search | — | — | 0 | 0 |
Location comes from each creator's own OnlyFans profile, read by our scraper. Sedona counts creators in Sedona or Village of Oak Creek; "nearby" adds towns within ~30 miles (Cottonwood, Camp Verde, Flagstaff…).
Right of reply
Run onlyseeker.io? Tell us what we got wrong. Replies are verified against your domain and published here after review.
Replies from the site
No replies from onlyseeker.io yet.